Ecat World News

The latest article on the Andrea Rossi, Levi, and Hanno Essén e-cat report.

A report that most critical readers will admit is an engineering report that is for the sole use of Andrea Rossi and his partners, (and which has been highly criticized for lacking professionalism and for unprofessional use of highly regarded University names through association), criticized in private emails, in many publications, and all over the internet.

You can read this latest article here:

Hanno Essén Admits Recent Test of E-cat NOT Science

THE END

Mr. Gary Wright has just published a new article on shutdownrossi.com.

It is called -

“Comparing Rossi’s Latest EPO Patent Filing with the Rossi/Levi/Essen Report”

As usual Mr. Wright has his own unique way of connecting the dots in this continuing Ecat story, that just keeps on going – like that old rabbit.

You do not want to miss this new article because Mr. Wright shows that the one and only thing that made Andrea Rossi stand out from the crowd was Rossi’s secret sauce, and now even that is gone, it seems.

With permission we quote the summary –

From the very beginning of the Andrea Rossi story starting when Rossi contacted Focardi, the one and only claim that allowed Rossi and Focardi to say they could not provide the details of the device, claiming it was a trade secret, was the additive.  In the 2010 paper by Focardi and Rossi we read:

“2. Experimental results
In this paper we report the results obtained with a process and apparatus not described here in detail and protected by patent in 90 countries, consisting of a system whose heat output is up to hundred times the electric energy input…The system on which we operate consists of Ni, in H atmosphere and in the presence of additives placed in a sealed container and heated by a current passing through a resistor.”

Rossi, Prof. Focardi, and many others have said numerous times that his e-cat would not operate as claimed, i.e. providing massive amounts of heat output at least one magnitude greater than the electrical input, and with the ability to operate in self-sustaining mode, without this secret catalyst.

In his attempt to obtain a EPO patent on the e-cat, on April 15, 2013, Andrea Rossi sent in to the EPO all new revised claims 1-7.  The most important of the revisions is No. 2 which Rossi has deleted in its entirety. This was the claim that included his secret catalyst.  Rossi is now claiming in his EPO patent application that this secret catalyst is not needed for any mode of operation of the e-cat

One of the most important results of this change in the patent application claims is that if what Andrea Rossi is now saying is true, than the additive was never needed from the beginning.  And we must look for other sources of heat for Rossi’s many demonstrations.

Has Andrea Rossi been fooling all of these scientists, engineers, and hardworking folks sending money to people like Roger Green in Australia for e-cat licenses?

Was Rossi lying when he said the secret catalyst was needed or is Rossi lying now when he says the secret catalyst is not needed?  Anyway you want to look at it Rossi is lying.  So what is new, just one more among hundreds.

This paper looks at that revised patent application claim and the other claim changes in detail.

************

THE END

What you are witnessing dear friends is science, in action, in real time.  It kind of seems to me a combination of the Herbert Dingle affair and the Pons/Fleischmann news release.

Pons and Fleischmann went to the news media first and the peer review came later.  Dingle went to Nature and other publications and was rebuffed.

By choice, Profs. Essén and Levi (and team) decided to publish in a preprint physics section of arXiv, without peer review.  And now we get to watch the peer review after the fact. It is interesting that the “peer review” by scientists so far published on the internet, includes not only technical questions the team has not been able to answer, but also addresses the ethical questions their paper brought forth, questions that they so far have refused to answer.

When we read the initial letter of Alessio Guglielmi addressed to the authors of the new paper on the testing of the ecat, we could not help but notice similarities of the questions raised by Alessio Guglielmi and some of the statements by Mr. Gary Wright in his article on shutdownrossi.com: Thoughts on the latest Andrea Rossi, Giuseppe Levi, and Hanno Essén paper.

With the kind permission from Alessio Guglielmi we have copied the two emails.  The only change made was to remove the email addresses in the letters.

*********************************************

Dear colleagues and friends,

I had an exchange with Prof. Essén and received two emails from him in response to my initial message reproduced below, and to another one where I repeated to him the two questions:

1) How does your paper advance knowledge?
2) Who will benefit from it?

Unfortunately, Prof. Essén refuses to answer these two questions, and at this point I am even more perplexed, because I believe that a senior researcher should always be able to answer those two questions without hesitation and with pride in his or her work. It is a pity that this seems not to be the case for the manuscript on arXiv, and I still hope that the other co-authors will be able to find convincing answers to those two very basic questions.

The only response for which Prof. Essén authorises publication is the following:

In the intervju I answered that there was no direct measurement of dc (since the clamps could not detec such). This was a bit hasty. In future I will not answer such technical questions without conferring with all coautors. After analysing what we checked and measured (which were many more variables that those from the clamps) we can definitely exclude dc-current. (This is what comes from being nice to journalists.)

Prof. Essén wrote this paragraph as a comment to this piece of interview that appeared on <http://www.pureenergyblog.com/?p=1232>:

——————————–
Interviewer: Have you tried to test the output of the power supply to exclude that also a DC current is supplied to the device, which clamp amperometers could not detect?

Prof. Essén: No, we did not think of that. The power came from a normal wall socket and there did not seem to be any reason to suspect that it was manipulated in some special way. Now that the point is raised we can check this in future tests.
——————————–

Could somebody please forward this email to Dr Foschi?

Anybody please feel free to publish this message wherever they see fit.

Best regards,

Alessio Guglielmi
University of Bath
http://alessio.guglielmi.name

——————————–
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 11:58:24 +0100
To: Giuseppe Levi, Torbjörn Hartman, Bo Höistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegnér, Hanno Essén
From: Alessio Guglielmi
Subject: Ethics of your recent work with Mr Rossi
Cc: Ugo Bardi, Dario Braga, Sylvie Coyaud, Camillo Franchini, Giancarlo Ruocco

Dear Doctors Levi, Foschi, Hartman, Höistad, Pettersson, Tegnér and Essén,

I have read your recent manuscript `Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder´ on arXiv and I am very perplexed.

You are aware that several alleged technical mistakes have been pointed out, such as omitting control on DC current input (which has been acknowledged by Prof. Essén in a recent interview) and assuming that the output heat is released by a perfect black body (this assumption is contested by Prof. Gianni Comoretto, for example). The picture that emerges, and I am sorry if this sounds offensive, is that some crucial measures have not been taken seriously enough on a discovery that, if genuine, would alter the history of mankind.

However, I have an issue that appears to me even more important, because it concerns the very essence of your continued activities on Rossi’s device. Our job as researchers is to advance knowledge, and to do so whatever we investigate must be reproducible by other researchers, so that the knowledge we generate becomes established and we can move forward. This seems at odds with your behaviour. You went to the workshop of a private individual who claims to be solving half of mankind’s problems, and performed measures on a device that you could not fully control and that is not available to other researchers. Therefore, your manuscript does not contain any reproducible experience. So, how does it advance knowledge? What do we learn?

This brings me to asking another natural question: who will profit from the release of your manuscript? You do realise that Mr Rossi sells distribution licences and that he needs to convince customers to order some of his plants. There is no doubt that your manuscript will help that market, but is this something that academics should do? Is our job to help a private sell his stuff in the absence of solid, reproducible evidence?

In other words, I wonder whether you are adhering to the scientific method and I wonder whether what you are doing is legitimate for academics. Others questioned your technical ability, but I think that the ethical questions that I am posing here come before, also because they are more understandable by the layman. I trust that you appreciate my frankness, and I hope that you can prove my concerns unjustified.

I am forwarding this letter in copy to several persons who are following this matter: Ugo Bardi (Professor of Chemistry, Univ. Florence, blogger), Dario Braga (Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research, University of Bologna), Sylvie Coyaud (Scientific Journalist, Il Sole 24 Ore), Camillo Franchini (blogger, former Supervisor of the CAMEN nuclear plant) and Giancarlo Ruocco (Pro-Vice-Chancellor for Research, La Sapienza, Rome). Whoever wishes to publish this letter is welcome to do so, of course, and I hope that also the answer could be given public form.

Could you please forward this letter to Dr Foschi, whose address I could not find?

Best regards,

Alessio Guglielmi
University of Bath
http://alessio.guglielmi.name

******************************************

THE END

Gary Wright broke the exclusive story about the fake factory Rossi was telling everyone about.
No question it never existed.

Gary Wright broke the exclusive story about the detailed inner workings of the Andrea Rossi/ Roger Green fraud and scam operation.  Never denied by Andrea Rossi or Roger Green.

Now Gary Wright is very near to bringing another exclusive to shutdownrossi.com, the untold story of the “Thermoelectric Scam” that was carried out by Andrea Rossi before his ecat scam.

Gary Wright has given us the permission to quote a little from that new article.

“If you have been following the Rossi ecat story then you will see within the “thermoelectric scam” the seeds of many of the same tricks Rossi has been using in the ecat scam.  Here are a few examples.

• Rossi’s was telling everyone that his first “robotized” factory was being built in Florida, until the Florida BRC sent their investigators, then Rossi had to admit it was all a lie. (Read about that story on the shutdownrossi.com website). If that is what you thought you would be wrong, Rossi’s first (imaginary) “robotized factory” was in New Hampshire, USA, not Florida.

• Bet you thought Rossi’s first experience at fooling the people testing and calculating the test results of Rossi’s technology demos started with the ecat demonstrations.  If so you would be wrong again, it was the “thermoelectric scam.”

• Rossi has always claimed it was his proprietary process of making the very expensive NI62 isotope in great quantities very inexpensively that allowed him to make and operate the ecats.  Want to know where he first started that concept, yes it had its roots in the “thermoelectric scam.”  Connected to this we discovered the possible reason why USA Nuclear Laser, Inc., in Ohio changed its name to Leonardo Technologies Inc.

• Did you think that the first license Rossi supposedly sold was for the ecat?  Wrong again, it involved the “thermoelectric scam.”  Or so they claim.

• The picture below is Andrea Rossi at the University of New Hampshire with his phony module.”

THE END

The new article by the Rossi/Levi/Essen team wants you to believe Rossi has a business making products, i.e., making and selling working e-cats.

If that is true maybe Rossi would like to tell us how many cancer children he has helped.

From the many stories by Mats Lewan, at NyTeknik.

“March 11, 2011 Lewan quotes Rossi: All the money spent up to now has been my money. Furthermore: we are not searching venture capital, we want to sell our energy, taking upon us all the risks, we are paying for all the R&D activity, we are not asking money from anyone. Our Customers pay money only after successful testing of our E-Cats: the money, in case of plants sale, remains in the Customer´s escrow account until successful testing is made. So any stupid trick could only damage ourselves, not the customers.”

And again we find this statement:

“March 10, 2011 Lewan quotes Rossi: The 500,000 Euros I am paying to the University of Bologna is my last money, but when I deliver the one-megawatt plant to Defkalion I get cash back. From then on, 50% will be used for expansion and 50% to treat children with cancer. I will personally look for the children whose families cannot afford their care.”

THE END

The Rossi/Levi/Essen Team received funding to obtain equipment, hire personnel, and for other expenses related to financing their latest report of Rossi’s e-cat.

Now Gary Wright is claiming that if his team receives the required funding that his team will duplicate the test and the report just like the Rossi team.

They will also stream in real time 24 hours a day the complete setup and test on the internet free for all to see.

Gary Wright writes here: http://shutdownrossi.com/e-cat-science/a-challenge-to-the-rossileviessen-team-and-their-report-on-the-fake-e-cat/

“Not only that but here is your chance to get shutdownrossi.com off the airways or etherways or off the electronways, or just off the internet.

‘…if we cannot reproduce the results of the test, very closely, as much as possible, using the same testing equipment, software, power sources, and methods as the original test, than we will take this site shutdownrossi.com off the internet.’”

Let the games begin!

THE END

One of the untold stories about Andrea Rossi was the story about LTI and Rossi’s Thermoelectric patent.  According to Mr. Gary Wright writing for shutdownrossi.com they just received the final FOIA papers.

They posted this today on the home page.

Breaking news !!!

We have just received – today – the final FOIA papers we asked for in relation to the Rossi Thermoelectric scam. Hope to have the article up by the first of next week.

Joy & Peace
Gary Wright
May 24, 2013

THE END

Still Waiting for even one True Independent 3rd Party Test of an e-cat based on Andrea Rossi’s Fraud and Scam?

So are these people.

Thoughts on the latest Andrea Rossi, Giuseppe Levi, and Hanno Essén paper.

http://shutdownrossi.com/e-cat-science/thoughts-on-the-latest-andrea-rossi-giuseppe-levi-and-hanno-essen-paper/

Rossi Manipulates Academics to Create Illusion of Independent Test

http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/05/21/rossi-manipulates-academics-to-create-illusion-of-independent-test/

Is Cold Fusion For Real?!

http://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries_survivor/cold_fusion_real-112511

The E-Cat is back, and people are still falling for it!

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/21/the-e-cat-is-back-and-people-are-still-falling-for-it/

COLD FUSION is BACK with ‘anomalous heat’ claim

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/22/e_cat_test_claims_success_yet_again/

THE END

Gary Wright is claiming that the new paper from Rossi/Levi/Essen

Proves that Rossi’s device is not self-sustaining and that all of the power comes from the electricity!

He also includes for download Appendix 1 and Appendix 2
by David Bianchini, M.Sc. missing from the original article.

Thoughts on the latest Andrea Rossi, Giuseppe Levi, and Hanno Essén paper.

The End

For the last few days DSM over on http://ecatnews.com/?p=2490#comments has been attacking Gary Wright viciously.

We see Mr. Wright has had enough and has finally written an answer on shutdownrossi.com.

Mr. Wright concludes with a “recap”: (used with permission)

01) DSM writes hate speech about me from around June-July 2012 up to the time you read this.

02) DSM posts some emails on ECN claiming to come from me but gets no response.

03) DSM posts two comments on ECN about Roger Green and his latest license offering with Japan, material that was only available via email from Roger and had not been posted anywhere on the internet.

04) I post my first article about the new Roger Green offering, with a mention to a Doug Marker. With no connection to DSM or ECN.

05) DSM writes a comment slamming me with false accusations.

06) DSM continues to post hate speech towards me over the next few days.

07) DSM claims he sent me emails, but it turns out to be a phony email address.

08) DSM claims he sent emails to many people about me, including Peter Gluck, but none of them contacted me.

09) Peter Gluck sent an email about his latest story to his list, both a Doug Marker and myself are on that list. It is an open list, you can see the peoples email addresses.

10) Both Peter Gluck and I exchange emails, but Peter does not mention DSM.

11) I write and post this article.

You can read this rebuttal to DSM here:

Gary Wright’s Personal Answer to Douglas Stuart Marker (DSM/Doug Marker)

 THE END

In an interesting event it seems now that Mr. Roger Green on his own website has linked to the video Mr. Gary Wright first exposed on the internet in his article about the Mr. Roger Green emails. This new article is kind of an update to an update.

Here is a link to the original article:

Andrea Rossi & Roger Green Fraud & Scam Update

Here is a link to the new update to the update:

Fraud Update to the Fraud Update – $1.00 a share for Roger Green e-Cat Stocks

THE END

Just when we think it is all coming to a halt Roger Green in Australia steps up his licensee selling program at fire sale prices.

Now is this a move to cash out as much as possible before the RICO lawsuits start as some are claiming?

You can read the latest with copies of all documents here:

Rossi & Roger Green Fraud & Scam Update

THE END

You have to admit it is a strange day indeed when a lawyer admits violating the law by passing out a business card with a title “Lawyer” on it, when he is not licensed in Nevada.

But that is just what Mr. Dan Glover has done on a web blog of devoted followers of his friend Mr. John P Rohner.  The complete article is here.

Update on the Mr. John Rohner (Inteligentry) Fraud

THE END

Things are getting stranger and weirder as days go by.

Gary Wright just published a short article quoting Daniele Passerini as saying he has shut down his blog.  This is coming just weeks before Rossi was promising to provide a true 3rd party verification of his e-Cat.

Are these two things connected?

Here is a link to Gary’s article:

Has 22 Steps of Love Given up on Rossi?

It seems the fall out from the latest article by Mr. Gary Wright called -

Sterling Allan (PESN) & John Rohner (Inteligentry) More Fraud and Scams – Part 1

is already in full swing.

It seems that any criticism of either of the Rohner brothers just creates a non ending flood of responses, not all justified.

Now the criticism about Mr. Wright by Mr. Bob Rohner has been answered here in this article.

Bob Rohner Seems a Little Confused

THE END

Shut Down Rossi has just published the first pictures of the Inteligentry booth at CES 2013.

There was no running engine onsite.  Read the complete story here:

THE END

And as we wait for something that may never happen in this crazy world – definitive actions that both Believers and Skeptics will accept as proof concerning whether the e-Cat is real or not – more stories just keep on coming.

Dr. Christian Schumacher put his pen to paper and published the best detailed history of the e-Cat and Andrea Rossi that we have read in a long time.

The article was published on December 21, 2012 and you can read the article at this link -

Is the e-cat real II. The fading dream for free and abundant energy 

About the author :  Dr. Christian Schumacher is the founder and managing director of StepChange Innovations GmbH. He has 20 years of experience in the chemical industry with global players such as Hoechst AG and DyStar Textilfarben GmbH as head of R&D, senior regional business manager Asia Pacific, head of e-commerce, head of marketing services, new product development manager and R&D chemist.

THE END

In Dr. Peter Gluck’s latest article:

A Hybrid Approach For Solving The LENR Problems

Dr. Gluck comes down real hard on Mr. Gary Wright while at the same time defending Mr. Andrea Rossi, again without providing any proof for Mr. Rossi’s claims, that we can see.

We thought Mr. Gluck had some interesting comments, but Mr. Wright wrote a very interesting article himself, about some of Mr. Gluck’s comments.

Mr. Wright’s article is titled and can be found here:

Gary’s Reply to Peter Gluck

Here is how Mr. Wright closed out his article: (Used with permission)

“What is the reason you would make such a statement?  One that is so very easily contradicted? Since you have no proof for the claims made by Andrea Rossi, are you just making things up as you go along, so you can continue to believe in your own e-cat fantasy?

So in conclusion, yes I believe the e-Cat is a fraud and a scam, I am very certain of that, and I have seen nothing, even of the slightest nature, to convince me otherwise.

And in the future, Mr. Gluck,  please try not to misrepresent my words.”

THE END

COPIED FROM THE WEBSITE – USED WITH PERMISSION

“Our Challenge to Mr. Christos Stremmenos

Since Gary Wright has been banned from the JONP we are publishing this article here.

To the Readers of the Journal Of Nuclear Physics:

I am sorry you all had to read the over 2,000 word, confused and rambling version of cold fusion as seen through the eyes of the Greek version of Mr. Hank Mills USA, Mr. Christos Stremmenos.

The reputation and critical thinking ability of Mr. Christos Stremmenos has been in question ever since he got caught up in the fraud and scam of Mr. Andrea Rossi, through his friend Mr. Sergio Focardi, another “scientist” who has also suffered the loss of his reputation and critical thinking ability, after meeting and working with the con-artist, scammer, and fraudster, Mr. Andrea Rossi, and his e-Cat Farce.

To read the complete article please go here on our website:

Our Challenge to Mr. Christos Stremmenos

Joy & Peace
Gary Wright
December 19, 2012″

THE END

It seems that Gary Wright does not like all of the talk about Andrea Rossi taking him to court for telling the truth about the e-Cat.

You can read about it here:       Rossi 1 Year Later

At the end of the article Gary says:

So yes we make the follow claims:

• The e-Cat of any type that is a product in R&D or for sale by Andrea Rossi or any of his companies or licensees is a fraud and a scam.  They do not operate as claimed and as published.
• Every licensee trying to sell an e-Cat is involved in fraud and a scam.
• Any scientist, engineer, or reporter that claims that the e-Cat operates as claimed and is a true working cold fusion/LENR device has just been conned and fooled by Andrea Rossi and his crew, partners, and associates.  They are fools, lacking basic objectivity, by not requiring the most basic of scientific protocols by requiring Andrea Rossi to allow true independent 3rd party testing and validation of the claims given of the e-Cat.
• We claim that the e-Cat is a fraud, scam, and farce, and anyone promoting and supporting it is also part of the fraud and scam.

Now if any person would like to challenge our claims above we would be happy to meet you in court.

THE END

Mr. Gary Wright is putting an article together about fraud and corruption in science and technology.

You can read his call for help here:

We Need Copies of Papers From Inteligentry & John Rohner Licensees

Mr. Wright says:

“We are putting together an article to be submitted to a major science magazine for publication, and you can help.

Since John Rohner has now violated his fiduciary duty as leader of all three of his corporations, by lying and misrepresenting his technology, no licensee is honor bound by any clause in any contracts, licensee agreements,  or NDAs made with John Rohner or any of his companies.

We are writing an article about the current status of Cold Fusion/LENR and Noble Gas engines.  To make this article as complete as possible we need copies of any and all contracts, NDSs, license agreements, or any other type of document with any of these three companies:

• Inteligentry, Ltd.
• PlasmERG, Inc.
• PTP Licensing, Ltd.

If you have copies of any of these documents and would like to help us in this article please provide copies of these documents to Gary Wright.”

Follow the link above to read the complete short article.

THE END

Why is it that there is not one “free energy” system powering a home anywhere in the world?

Do you maybe think that all of these millions of man hours and millions of dollars have been wasted?

Why is it that when you look at all of these systems most are just trying to re-invent the wheel?

Their ideas have already been tried and they didn’t work, why spend time on the same idea again?

There are very good computer programs that can analyze any type of electrical or magnet circuit that anyone can conceive.

There are very good computer programs that can analyze any type of mechanical system that anyone can conceive.

Why don’t all of the people who want to work in this field do this:

• Set up a computer lab to analyze all of these ideas before much time or any money has been spent on them.
• Whoever is running the system could charge a small fee to input the design and produce the output.  That would pay for the computer system and the cost to run it.
• Think of all of the millions of dollars and man hours that will be saved.
• You could even set it up so every system that is analyzed is put online for all to see.  That way if someone comes up with what they think is a new idea they can check to see similar results before spending time and money on it.
• Also the people operating the system in their spare time could input expired patents into the system to show everyone how they would work in the real world.
• It could be a place where anyone could go who is approached for money for a “free energy” system.  They could say, have your system analyzed there before I will invest.  Kind of like a UL system for “free energy.”

Just my two cents worth.

THE END

.

Is no one trying to run a “free energy” scam who is connected to Andrea Rossi free from the mighty sword (pen) of Gary Wright?

Gary is now accusing one of Mr. Andrea Ross’s partners, Mr. Sterling D. Allan of running “free energy” scams of his own.  Just days after Mr. Allan put up a webpage accusing others of doing the exact same thing.

You can read the whole sordid story here:

Fraud Alert!! PESN Sterling Allan Involved in Scam on 12-04-2012

—

Crunch time for John Rohner.

Gary Wright has written a new story called: click on title to read the story.

“Are Inteligentry Engines and e-Cats Brochureware?”

Gary ends his new story with these comments: Used with permission.

“If John has a working Noble Gas Engine as he claims, and it will be demonstrated at the December 11, 2012 show, and if John has the organization of manufacturers in place as he claims, then Andrea Rossi might as well pack up his marbles (e-Cats) and go home.

But then again, after four years of vaporware and brochureware, if John Rohner via Inteligentry does not come through with a working engine at this show in two weeks, then I will actively put John Rohner on my confirmed list of scammers and fraudsters.

(Added December 1, 2012.  Just for a point of clarification.  This working engine must prove John’s claim that he has an engine that uses a very small amount of electricity that in turn creates a plasma in some Noble gas that powers an engine that produces 150 HP.  If John just hooks up an electric motor to a battery or the mains, and lets that run during the show that will prove nothing. John say this on his website:

“How the Plasmic Transition Process(tm) system works.

    To start this discussion, this Engine is not, just as the original Papp engine was not, a Pulsed Plasma motor.  Plasma is not retained and pulsed as many others have stated. The plasma is recreated with each power stroke and returns to a steady state gas on each return stroke thus the name Plasmic Transition Process . The initial power event and creation of plasma, for expansion, is derived from a actuation event within the cylinder, a very high voltage ball, similar to a lightning ball, is created at Top Dead Center (TDC) which creates a Plasmic Transition, expansion of 5 to 1, which is contained in a sealed cylinder thus pushing the Piston and rotating the crankshaft system.
In a single cylinder engine there are only 3 moving parts so the addition of a flywheel is required to provide the kinetic energy to complete the non powered cycle. There is no need to recycle electrons from one cylinder to another unless you are looking for a perpetual motion machine.
This is a new system that crosses the previous borders the science of Physics as it is part Fusion, fission and plasma working together utilizing elements of each to the advantage of the result. this result is power.
The output Torque is steady over the range of the Rotation of the engine, roughly 400 Ft Lbs in a 500 CC engine, at any engine rotational speed. So Horse Power is a straight rising line… As a Pilot it intrigues me how the 1 liter Twin, which makes about the same power as a six cylinder internal combustion engine, but with 1/4 the weight, could be on a personal aircraft that could fly, even at 90 miles an hour, across the ocean and then turn around and fly back. Put a good “auto pilot” in and kick back and relax in your own space.”

Gary)

Everyone, no matter how far out their claims, should have their day in court, so to speak.  They should have the opportunity to present their claims to be evaluated and tested.  The world has been waiting for hundreds of years for a small free energy device that can transform this sea of energy in which we are all immersed into a source of unlimited, usable energy coming through that device, without meters or control by others.  That day will come, the only question is when, and who will bring us the actual working device, this Holy Grail?”

THE END

More on Tyler & Are the Leaders of ISCMNS Supporters of Rossi’s Scam?

Not much is happening in the Rossi world lately and for the foreseeable future.  Just more daily postings by Rossi, when he should be hard at work, getting those 10KW e-Cats into the hands of the needy of the world, or even for you and I.

But there is some new information and videos to watch. Gary Wright has published a new article about ICCF-17.  With permission here is some information taken from the website

http://shutdownrossi.com

“Gary has written more about ICCF-17 and Tyler. This time though Gary is including links for streaming videos of three never shown before full length videos taken during the ICCF-17 conference.  The three presentations you can watch here on this site include: The Nagel talk. The Frank Gordon talk. And the Tyler talk.
Here are some highlights of the new article:”

“Why did we publish the article “Tyler van Houwelingen Apologetics for Rossi”?  Mike McKubre says 1st Rossi 1MW customer was not US military.”

“If you write articles, books, stories, have websites or produce videos that basically contain a lot of what “Rossi says or what other people say about Rossi,” or if you speak in videos, at seminars or conferences, on the radio, TV or the internet about what “Rossi says or what other people say about Rossi,”  even if you use disclaimers, than you are promoting, encouraging, and supporting Rossi.”

“On one side you have those who promote, ally with, and encourage Rossi by being “for Rossi,” “being neutral,” or “being a partner”; on the other side you have those that speak out against Rossi.  The fence separating the two sides is so narrow and so tall now, that no person can walk it.”

“Nagel also promoted Roger Green and his e-Cat site for a place where people can go to get a good comparative economic evaluation of an e-Cat.  Please see our analysis of the Roger Green part in Rossi’s scam here.”

About Tyler’s presentation in the Q & A:

“Peter Hagelstein, “Interesting presentation, I heard presentations something like this before…and I walk away scratching my head a little bit, in terms of facts some of the things that you presented I might disagree with a little bit…one of these days somebody ought to put in some time and effort to get a version of this thing that actually is correct.”

Then Tyler asked Peter, “my email is on there…send me the changes.”

Peter Hagelstein, “Well it would probably start from the beginning and include almost everything all the way to the end…””

This what Nagel is saying now about Rossi:

“…Rossi apparently did experiments in 2007-2009 when he had the first demonstration that I am aware of, which was in the US, I worked with him on two demonstrations in 2010, both of which failed, with Rossi…”

And much, much more, read all about it by clicking on the link below.

More on Tyler & Are the Leaders of ISCMNS Supporters of Rossi’s Scam?

THE END

Gary Wright is concerned about who this man is and if he is alright, and still in good health.

Gary has real concerns that something may have happened to him after pretending to be the representative for Andrea Rossi’s first customer.  Everyone wants to make sure he is OK and has not fallen into any type of harm.

We therefore agreed to put this wanted poster on our website to help Gary out and to find out who this man is and to make sure he is alright.

If you have any information about who this man is and how we can verify his safety please contact us through the contact form on this website.  Here is his photograph.  Any help and information would be greatly appreciated, thank you.

A different kind of analysis of the document “Is Commercial Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) The Real Deal?” by Tyler, has just been published.

This new article shows that even though Tyler says his paper about Rossi and investing in LENR is based only on facts, that is far from the truth.

And as always Gary Wright, the author, does not hold back his punches.  Here are a couple of quotes from the article, (used with permission).

• The publication by Tyler van Houwelingen called “Is Commercial Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) The Real Deal?” is a perfect example of why it is clear that Andrea Rossi has created a religious following of disciples, bowing and groveling at his feet just waiting for the chance to kiss his metaphorical ring.

• We wanted to just ignore Tyler, but Tyler and his manifesto have become a perfect example of why we say – Rossi with his e-Cat religion and his disciples are doing more damage to the whole cold fusion/LENR field than all of the critics combined.

• Since Tyler’s publication and talk at ICCF-17 was asked for, allowed, and is being promoted by the cold fusion/LENR group, it is clear to us this type of thing is one more reason why very few take cold fusion/LENR seriously today.  It must also be remembered that originally Tyler’s main reason for producing his document and talk was to promote Rossi’s e-Cat religion. (It is now only thinly veiled.)

We think that Gary Wright’s position is that if Tyler’s publication looks so bad to him, it will look that way to any other critical thinker, and therefore will have the opposite effect than that intended by Tyler.

You can read the complete article here on this page:

Tyler van Houwelingen Apologetics for Rossi

===

“The examination of the above-identified application has revealed that it does not meet the requirements of the European Patent Convention for the reasons enclosed herewith”

You can read the whole story here at this location  Rossi’s EPO Patent Denied

The article includes copies of the EPO documents.

What’s next for Mr. Rossi?

We have been following the rebuilding of the website http://shutdownrossi.com

The information and pages are much better organized and much easier to find now.

We see today that all of the Roger Green & Robert K. E-mails were put back up.

We are still waiting for the promised stories on the Thermoelectric Project and the SGS Certification.  It seems that waiting is par for the course with anything connected with Mr. Andrea Rossi.

With permission we have copied the latest blog post of Gary Wright.

Gary Wright has just published an article giving a current and up-to-date peek into how and why the USPTO is rejecting cold fusion/LENR patents.

The story is based on a complete analysis of the Santilli LENR patent, including the latest papers sent to the USPTO by Santilli on October 18, 2012 and the Oral Interview in October also. Here are some of the patent examiner’s comments in the section “The Final Rejection.”

•  “More importantly, said Declaration fails to provide direct and convincing evidence that a preponderance of evidence against utility as transpired from the examination of the state of the art as set forth in the prior Office Action does not exist: websites to what basically are applicant’s own work are less than convincing because the examiner should already reasonably have concluded that applicant stands by his own work: It has long been known what applicant believes he has achieved. Furthermore, the problem is not that no proponents can be found, but that there is a preponderance of evidence against credibility of the asserted utility. Since applicant is convinced, why not submit his work in the form of a working device to be tested by a scientifically reputed and fully neutral institution, such as either the National Institute of Science and Technology ( NIST) or the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)? A positive outcome of such test would certainly convince any examiner to withdraw the rejections for lack of utility and for lack of enablement.”

• “Finally, applicant is kindly invited to provide evidence of the scientific standing of the journal ” New Advances in Physics”; neither the examiner nor search support staff has been able to find said journal indexed in any commercial database.”

• “According to examiner’s information, furthermore, and applicant may correct examiner if incorrect: Manager and CEO of aforementioned publishing company is his spouse, Ms. Carla Santilli, casting some doubt on the neutrality of the publishing company.”

Mr. Rossi take note, the patent office does not like information from self published blogs and phony “scientific journals.”

You can read the complete article here in the section “Technology Patents and IP.”

Why USPTO Rejected Santilli Patent

Some good reading there.

An English PDF with links to all of the papers is available for download   Kongress080912N-e

Energy Turnaround with E-Cat Technology
Revolutionary environmentally friendly energy systems
Congress on Saturday 8 September and Sunday 9 September 2012
Technopark Zurich, Technoparkstr. 1, CH 8005 Zurich,

Gary Wright has an update to his article on Mats Lewan called,

“Latest on Hydro Fusion & Rossi”

He says:

“We have been getting reports about Mr. Rossi going silent when asked why 2 blog sites are the only place to read his latest testing info.

For the first time since May 2012, ECAT.com – The Official Website of Andrea Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer, E-Cat has posted something on their website.

Does this mean that Magnus Holm, CEO Hydrofusion and Mr. Rossi are mending fences and getting back together as we predicted.”

Read the complete article HERE

——-

Now here is an interesting article on the internet. Open article to get the links.

The article is by the retired Dr. Peter Gluck who has been following the Mr. Andrea Rossi, E-Cat story from the beginning. It is a long article about the website shutdownrossi.com.

You can read the article HERE.

We will let the readers judge the article after reading it themselves, but we noticed one thing; mostly it is about what Mr. Gluck thinks about the certainty in the tone and contents of the website.

Like most people following the story of the E-Cat, Mr. Gluck seems to have mixed emotions about Mr. Rossi.  Maybe one of these days someone will write an article about why so many people are mesmerized by Mr. Rossi in this way.

The following information was added to the article on the Mr. John Rohner patent.

We think the new updates are definitely worth reading.

“Misleading comments posted on the Inteligentry.com website prompted us to provide an UPDATED-REVISED-EXPANDED article on the rejection of all 18 claims in the John Rohner Noble gas engine patent application. Please read the latest version, even if you read the first one, because three more complete patents are included that were referenced by the patent examiner.

First of all we never said that the patent application was dead.  But we also think Mr. John Rohner’s statements above were worded to be deliberately misleading.  Mr. Rohner is trying to give the impression that because the original patent was spit into two patents, then all of the latest comments by the patent examiner were to explain just how Mr. Rohner must revise his patent application accordingly. Nothing could be further from the truth.  But Mr. Rohner has now muddied the waters by stirring them up with these misleading statements.  Here is the truth of the situation.  We will provide what has happened at every step of the way, working forwards.”

Please read the complete article HERE.  Open story to get the link.

Includes the complete 163 page USPTO patent history on the Inteligentry Noble Gas Patent.

We can only say Mr. Gary Wright must have some insider knowledge to continue this relentless dogging of Mr. Andrea Rossi.  Does he know something the rest of us do not?

His latest posting finishes out the Mr. Roger Green and Mr. Robert K. emails.  But there is more, you will have to read it for yourself.  He says:

“Fire Sale on e-Cat licenses! Please see the last of the Roger Green emails HERE.” Open story to get the link.

“And please don’t forget we still have the SGS and Thermoelectric investigations coming up in the next few weeks.  And more on Mr. Rossi’s patent applications is coming soon.  Our patent attorney in Italy has told us to just wait until the USPTO and the EP results are in, then poor Mr. Rossi will have no exclusive  patent protection (maybe none at all) even in Italy.  Please stay tuned as they say.”

On September 5, 2012 – Transfer Inquiry to GAU – The GAU is the final destination where the patent examiners will make their final analysis and give their final answer – Yes or No.

Won’t be long now.  Of course there is a lot of negotiation that can go on during this stage.  And of course the decision, if the patent is rejected, can be appealed both at the patent office and in the courts.

It all depends on how much money Mr. Rossi wants to spend pursuing this, and how much he can gain financially while the appeals are still going on.

Our take away.  Rossi is going to fight this to the very end, and blame it on the oil companies – big brother – the Illuminati -  the corrupt patent system, etc.

His money is coming from licensees anyway. It is not like it is out of his pocket or from the sales of any e-Cats.

On September 10, 2012 documents were received at the USPTO, by John P. Rohner, RE: US Patent application No.: US 2011/0113772 A1. Mr. Rohner agreed to split his patent into two different patents, one for the motor, one for the electronics, with this document submittal the two patents will now go to final examination.

It will be interesting to see what the USPTO has to say about Mr. Rohner’s Noble Gas Engine.  They can still claim the engine will not work without patent #2.  The wait should be over soon.

There has been a lot of discussion, since Mr. Rossi had his first major PR demo in January 2011, about his past projects including his Thermoelectric project with the DOD/DOE.  Nobody has been able to find out much about it.  Now Gary Wright has created a page on his website called “Rossi’s Thermoelectric DOD/DOE Scam” that looks like an update to his progress in his investigation into that part of Mr. Rossi’s life.  You can read the complete story HERE.  Open the article to get the link.

The project of Mr. Andrea Rossi has been criticized from the day of his first public demonstration in January 2011. Many articles, from the major media to internet bloggers, have chimed in with their voice.

The most vocal critic at this time is a website called “shutdownrossi.com.” The theme of that website is: “Rossi & e-Cat a Scam/Fraud or True – You Decide”  The major writer on that website, Gary Wright, has just posted a comment about why he thinks Mr. Andrea Rossi is involved in a” scam.”

We thought it was interesting enough to ask Mr. Wright if we could put up the complete, very short article here. So, with his permission, here is Mr. Wright’s thoughts on why he calls Mr. Andrea Rossi a scammer and fraudster.

“The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
fraud n.
1. A deception practiced in order to induce another to give up possession of property or surrender a right.
2. A piece of trickery; a trick.
3a. One that defrauds; a cheat.
3b. One who assumes a false pose; an impostor.

swindle
v. swin·dled, swin·dling, swin·dles
v.tr.
1. To cheat or defraud of money or property.
2. To obtain by fraudulent means: swindled money from the company.
v.intr.
To practice fraud as a means of obtaining money or property.
n.
The act or an instance of swindling.

*******
Sometimes it is helpful to read the definitions from more than one source – so we also give you these definitions.
*******
From – http://dictionary.reference.com/
fraud
noun
1. deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.
2. a particular instance of such deceit or trickery: mail fraud; election frauds.
3. any deception, trickery, or humbug: That diet book is a fraud and a waste of time.
4. a person who makes deceitful pretenses; sham; poseur.

swindle
verb (used with object)
1. to cheat (a person, business, etc.) out of money or other assets.
2. to obtain by fraud or deceit.
verb (used without object)
3. to put forward plausible schemes or use unscrupulous trickery to defraud others; cheat.
noun
4. an act of swindling or a fraudulent transaction or scheme.
5. anything deceptive; a fraud: This advertisement is a real swindle.

*******
This website has tried to show with clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Rossi and his e-Cat Farce clearly comes under the definitions as shown above.  If the public and those in the cold fusion/LENR field refuse to open their eyes and minds to look at the truth, there is no hope for them.  At least we have done all we could to shine a little light on the methods and practices of Mr. Rossi, his partners, and the scientists, engineers, and others supporting his fraud and swindle – the e-Cat – Hot Cat – Classic Cat or anything else you want to to call it.

Joy & Peace
Gary Wright
September 17, 2012″

That is the new theme to Gary Wright’s website.
The twists and turns to this story continues.
The website of Gary Wright was down for a little while and the rumors started with-in minutes. (Gary Wright has a website that is very critical of Mr. Rossi, because Mr. Rossi refuses to allow a 3rd party validation of the e-cat.) Was he hacked, was he afraid of legal repercussions, was he shut down by Mr. Rossi, these were just some of the comments.

Whole stories were posted about this subject, here are just a few:

Friday, September 14, 2012 “Mark roundings, lunches and points of view”  by Daniele Passerini at “22 Steps of Love.”

Enrico Billi
“The content of the Snake’s website have been deleted.” at http://www.facebook.com/groups/ECat.LENR/

ShutdownRossi.com : down
by AlainCo » Fri 14 Sep 2012, 07:59  at lenrforum.eu

Well it seems that Gary Wright was just making some small changes and the site is alive again.  Has he softened his attacks? Not really, look at what he now says on the “Home” page HERE.  (Used with permission.)

“As you can see the new theme is: Rossi & e-Cat a Scam/Fraud or True – You Decide

It is the People who will Decide – History just records their decision!

It is the people who will decide if they want to allow Mr. Rossi to continue his scam and fraud.  And yes, History will record their decision for all time.

a) What effect do you think it has on the struggling field of cold fusion/LENR every time a writer writes about this? It is very rare that an article is written that does not include comments about Mr. Rossi’s scam and fraud.  Wouldn’t it be nice if all the articles could be about the legitimate cold fusion/LENR projects and people? Imagine how fast the public perception of this field would turn around.  Funding would increase exponentially.  People on the fence would jump off and start to become a part of this growing field.  More well known scientists would get involved because this black eye had been healed, and the junk science label would gradual go away.  But these good things will not happen as long as people like Mr. Andrea Rossi are running their scams and swindles, who wants to be a part of that?

The following information was given to us to publish.

It has been verified and is true and authentic.

One of the signatories on Mr. Rossi’s “Voluntary Certificate” has stated the following:

“Anyway my personal judgment is SGS name is being used to deliver the idea of a kind of certification totally different from what we stated.”

“In the disclaimer we clearly state our certificate shall not be used for commercial purpose. It seems to me here the certificate was sent with a scope in violation with our disclaimer.”

“The machine is not certified”

That is all we have at this time.  We were told the investigation is continuing.

Of course if we are given any new verifiable information we will post it here.

ADMIN

We have decided to leave the comments open but they will be heavily moderated, so keep it nice and clean if you want to get through.  ADMIN

While we wait for the much anticipated report on the testing of the 600C e-cat, there are other stirrings in the Rossi world. This new story has its roots way back into 2010.

On June 27, 2012 Peter Gluck posted the text of a Skype interview he had recorded with someone claiming to be from DGTG management two days previously.

Peter Gluck did not give the name of the person being interviewed, which we thought was extremely odd since this was just an informal chat, and did not involve military secrets. The link to the original article is HERE: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/06/interview-with-defkalion-i-business.html

Mr. Gluck did not state the reason for the interview in the original article. But it looked like a news release trying to attract more money through investor licensing, but in the form of an interview.

Then on July 4th, 2012 at 4:36 AM Christos Stremmenos felt the unrestrained urge to reply to the article by Mr. Gluck on the personnel blog of Andrea Rossi HERE: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=645&cpage=4#comment-269793

Mr. Gluck intercepted the fast moving ball and has it now back in his court with a reply made on his website July 4, 2012, called “My Answer to Prof. Christos Stremmenos” which can be read HERE: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/07/my-answer-to-prof-christos-stremmenos.html

That is where the story ends so far, we are now waiting for Mr. Stremmenos to swiftly sweep in and cleverly steal the ball back as Mr. Gluck is moving towards his basket for a slam dunk.

Instead of writing about this odd exchange in narrative form we have decided to just ask some questions, in the hope that the players in this game, Mr. Gluck, Mr. Stremmenos, and someone from DGT will see the wisdom and advantage they will get by posting their replies here on this website.

1. Why was the identity of the person from DGT in the original interview with Mr. Gluck withheld?
2. What was the purpose of the original interview with Mr. Gluck?
3. Who initiated the original interview with Mr. Gluck?
4. The last time Mr. Stremmenos responded to statements from Defkalion he did so through Mats Lewan via Ny Teknik a public news magazine who had been covering the ongoing story.  Why didn’t he respond the same way this time?
5. Both Andrea Rossi and Defkalion claim that they just want to be left alone so they can work in peace and quiet, so why did Defkalion do this interview?
6. For full disclosure, does Mr. Stremmenos have a business relationship with Mr. Andrea Rossi, or any company associated with Rossi?
7. For full disclosure, did Mr. Stremmenos invest any money with Mr. Andrea Rossi, or any company associated with Rossi?
8. For full disclosure, did Mr. Stremmenos invest any money with Defkalion, or any company associated with Defkalion?
9. For full disclosure, if Mr. Stremmenos did invest any money with Defkalion, or any company associated with Defkalion, did he get his money back when he severed his ties with them?
10. For full disclosure, did Mr. Gluck invest any money with Defkalion, or any company associated with Defkalion?
11. For full disclosure, does Mr. Gluck have a business relationship with Defkalion, or any company associated with Defkalion?
12. Instead of just slinging mud back and forth why doesn’t Mr. Stremmenos post a copy of the contract Defkalion had with Rossi’s Italian company EFA, that is if the contract is now null and void as both parties claim?
13. In the original interview DGT says they were created in 2011, but Marianne Macy published a report on Jan 14, 2011 in which she states that Defkalion had been testing e-cats for over 6 months.  No one has ever published a correction to her statement.  When did Defkalion truly get involved with Andrea Rossi and his companies?
14. In the original interview DGT says that they assembled a group of scientists after the breakup with Rossi.  Why don’t the publish the names of these scientists and the results of their research?
15. In the rebuttal by Mr. Stremmenos he says he is coming to the defense of “the dignity of LENR or COLD FUSION.”  Now if Mr. Stremmenos is truly worried about defending the dignity of LENR and Cold fusion why has he partnered with a known felon, someone who conned the US government for a personnel gain of $900,000, created and walked away from $millions in environmental damage, and refuses to allow a true 3^rd party test of his device and claims?
16. In the rebuttal by Mr. Stremmenos he also says DGT was formed in 2010.  Why doesn’t someone post the original legal documents creating DGT, to put this matter to rest?
17. In the rebuttal by Mr. Stremmenos he says “…when a certain sum would have been guaranteed for collection on the part of EFA, subsequent to the success of a test performed by a certifying body (the University of Patras).” Now it is clear that no 3^rd party independent test of a Rossi e-cat was ever done at the University of Patras, so why does Mr. Stremmenos think DGT was at fault in the supposed breakup, causing a contract cancellation?
18. Mr. Gluck says on his blog that the 3^rd party independent test at the University of Patras was to last over 48 hours.  Now this should not have been a big deal for Rossi because he claimed to have a device working for over 2 years heating his “factory.” Where is any report of a test over 24 hours by Rossi with an e-cat?
19. Why hasn’t Defkalion provided any test reports as they promised?
20. It is clear people are tired of all of the conflicting claims that have anything to do with Andrea Rossi and  Defkalion, why don’t they step up and start producing some documentation about everything they do and say?  Every new episode like this just makes them both look more and more like they don’t have anything they claim.

=====

Peter Glucksays: